Okay I think I've done this wrong but well at least I tried eh.


Many people believe that runes are untrue and that the are mindless scribbling. But these are the words of our ancestors they wrote down these things millions of years ago and they properly never thought that we would read them. One problem though is how do we know what we are translation is correct. We could have got the whole alphabet wrong and be making up any random rubbish and posting it. But do you really think that is possible? If we had gotten it all wrong how come the translated version of a rune makes sense?
So I bring it to you how could we possibly get the translations wrong yeah we might get a few odd bits wrong but never full translations because then they could come out like odhgu jagj rrr instead of Mrs Polly Potter.
Many people might think that they are inaccurate because there is absolutely no evidence that, that is what they say. Yes of course we have the word of translators but how can we not tell that maybe they have taken educated guesses at it all. How do we all know that they haven’t simply messed it all up or that the runes were children drawing on rocks. Things like this could not possibly be true “The world of Suikoden uses "runes" as a source of special abilities and magic. In addition to the common "lesser runes" there are 27 "True Runes" from which the lesser are born. True Runes hold immense power, and grant immortality to the their bearers. But many times, it is not all it is cracked up to be, especially considering that True Runes have a will of their own, and a weak-minded person will not be the master of the rune, but a mere vessel for it.” How could something hold a powerful thing. Well simple that is properly an old tale told my many people over and over again. And so the evidence that the runes are true is incontrovertible. Every argument that the other side has can be crossed as shown above.